> One can always get the effect specified by R5RS by wrapping a (let > () ...) around the (let-syntax ...), which could itself be specified > as a separate syntax-rules macro.
Good point. I'll log this as a bug, and think about the backwards compatibility issues some more. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
