On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:20:12 +0200
Vojtěch Čihák <vojtech.ci...@atlas.cz> wrote:
> Thanks. I understand now.
>
> I tested it a little (Lazarus 1.1 r41895M FPC 2.7.1 x86_64-linux-qt) and I
> have two issues:
>
> 1) Inconsistent behaviour when both options are UNchecked (Update all method
> signatures and Update multiple procedure signatured are OFF)
>
> this:
> procedure A(a: string); | //hit CTRL+SHIFT+C here
> procedure B(a: string);
>
> implementation
>
> procedure A;
> begin
>
> end;
>
> procedure B;
> begin
>
> end;
>
> leads to this:
>
> procedure A(a: string); |
> procedure B(a: string);
>
> implementation
>
> procedure A(a: string);
> begin
>
> end;
>
> procedure B;
> begin
>
> end;
Correct.
> BUT this:
>
> public
> { public declarations }
> procedure A(a: string); | //hit CTRL+SHIFT+C here
> procedure B(a: string);
> end;
>
> var
> Form1: TForm1;
>
> implementation
>
> { TForm1 }
>
> procedure TForm1.A;
> begin
>
> end;
>
> procedure TForm1.B;
> begin
>
> end;
>
> leads to this:
>
> public
> { public declarations }
> procedure A(a: string); |
> procedure B(a: string);
> end;
>
> var
> Form1: TForm1;
>
> implementation
>
> { TForm1 }
>
> procedure TForm1.A(a: string);
> begin
>
> end;
>
> procedure TForm1.B(a: string);
> begin
>
> end;
>
> procedure TForm1.B;
> begin
>
> end;
>
> i.e. the third method is created
Correct. Disabling the option gets the old behavior.
> 2) Attempt to update signature of procedure (not method) backwards from
> implememtation to interface leads to Acces Violation or Out of memory error,
> it sometimes kills IDE.
Please create bug report with an example.
> It works well for one method, as you mentioned in your mail.
Mattias
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
