Hi, Thanks, I will incorporate your changes in the distribution source.
> How long do you think it will be before 1.09 is final? I prefer to give the packages first to the mailing list members before made package publicly available. As you can see, people interested, can uncover potential bugs before RPM and other stuff is realeased. This approach seems to work well, indeed. In old releases, I saw ugly things like: liblcms-1.06-37 Latter realeases didn't reach such patch level, ver 1.08 got only liblcms-1.08-3 and I would be happy if this one got same few modifications. But otherwise, this is taking so long because the profiling package, that is huge and a lot more complex that the CMM itself. Anyway, I don't think it would take too much more. lcms.1-09 seems pretty stable right now. Assume a week or so. Just the time to update the site. > PS this doesn't break anything for me but you really shouldn't > do this because the prefix "__" is reserved for compiler symbols: > > #define __cms_H You are right. This is reserved, but otherwise the chance of find a clashing symbol is so small, that... well ;-) Best regards, and thanks again for the carefull review! Mart� Maria The little cms project http://www.littlecms.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
