Hi, I’m using littlecms 1.14 to convert scanner
images to the sRGB color space, but I encountered a problem in validating the numeric accuracy
of my custom scanner profile, which I created with a recent version of the lcms_profiler
(lcms_profiler_beta3.exe). The sRGB values are not quite what they are supposed
to be. I scanned a W. Faust IT8/7 Target with an Epson
GT-30000 scanner at 300 dpi without any color correction settings and used this to generate a scanner profile, where I used
the accurate, relative colorimetric, 33 point preset (which seemed to work
best for me). then I used the measurement file of the profiling
procedure and the custom scanner profile as input to icctrans (v.1.9) in order
to compare the results with the Lab values in my target
reference file. The commandline arguments I used: - icctrans -i <custom profile> -o
*Lab –t 1 <measurement_file> The Lab results were quite promising, but when I
extended this test with the standard sRGB output profile in order to verify the
accuracy of sRGB values, I got huge deviations between the color
values computed by icctrans and my own values (which I computed with several
color calculators from the Lab values). For example: Lab-Value: (93.41, -1.20,
-0.26) Should be:
234 237 237 Icctrans: R=217.53 G=225.72
B=222.89 Most other color values are
similarly far apart from the correct sRGB value. I started icctrans with
following arguments: - icctrans –I <custom
profile> -o “sRGB Color Space Profile.icm” –t 1 <measurement_file> Any ideas what might be the problem here? Thanks! Best regards Dietmar Dreyer |
- [Lcms-user] Inaccurate sRGB-Conversion? Dietmar Dreyer
- Re: [Lcms-user] Inaccurate sRGB-Conversion? Gerhard Fuernkranz