On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 13:16, Richard Doyle wrote: > Personally, I don't care whether sources are provided directly or > upstream as long as they are publicly accessible. Unfortunately, this is > not always the case for LEAF releases, which can include binaries > compiled from modified sources, where the modifications are not publicly > available.
Richard, If true, this is unacceptable. Please email a list of packages that have upstream modifications of GPL code to me off-list. Include as much information about the package as possible. I'll attempt to contact the person who compiled the package, and try to resolve the situation. Thanks. Everyone, Any modification of GPL upstream source while creating a LEAF package mandates release of the modified code. Preferably the modified source should be released in a source tarball with changelog. Alternately, source can be provided in your cvs devel tree. I thought everyone understood this. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
