On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 20:57 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > I do not see a real need to migrate. > > The current cvs usage "just works" and I haven't heart complains from users > that there are any difficulties using cvs. Not to mention performance pb's > with the few checkouts a week.
a simple user (me) note: I see one benefit. Script updates would pull in new files automagically. > Given that I'm the one, who has done most of the commits the last two years > and every tag since we started to use cvs seriously, I'd like to stick to > what I'm used to. understandable, I'v only worked with svn and find cvs tricky, and confusing :) > And keep in mind a few tools to make release rely on cvs, these has to > reworked, if we switch to svn. Thanks for all the great work you put into this project! kind regards Ronny Aasen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
