Hi again,
I've been wondering - what's the "accepted" approach to updating the
wiki? Should everybody with write access (I seem to have write access)
just go ahead, or should there be some discussion about proposed changes
first? I know, changes in the Wiki can be backed out again relatively
easily, but just like in CVS (or git, or whatever), that causes extra
work, that might be avoided by simply talking about changes one wants to
make.
For now, what I have in mind is to make some minor changes to the
OpenVPN chapter (since it obviously needs work) - but I don't want to
alienate those who did all of the work so far, by making some changes
and "breaking the rules" in the process.
So, I figured I'd ask first...
Martin
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my phone;
my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my phone
-- Bjarne Stroustrup
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish
your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
