On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 20:48 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi all; > > as a summarize of the discussio of the last days: > > - the binaries has been moved to a new repository as a compromise between > popular demand and the needs of the release dude - so they are not any longer > in the way of a nice build environment. > They are in leaf/packages repository (namely leaf/packages/4_0). The > respository is organised by major versions (4.0, 4.1, 5.0...). That way we > can > add fixed packages for 4.0 (which leads to 4.0.1 version) in 4_0, while 4_1 > can > offer packages in testing/beta for 4.1.
KP, I see I was a bit late with this suggestion. > I'll try to take care that genpage.pl will support that new ideas (replace > testing with 4.1, two seperate changelogs etc) Thanks. > - the current leaf/leaf repository consists now only of the "buildtool", the > > environment (buildtool, sources and build helpers) for Bering-uClibc4. > > Andrews proposal is to (once again and hopefully finally) move all the > current > "buildtool" content to a more speaking name: bering-uclibc4 directory. > That way we may add more directories for development under leaf/leaf, like > bering-uclibc5, bering-uclibc-mips, bering-uclibc-experimental..., > developement trees, which may be added if branching gets too complicated, or > to give other LEAF variants a place to live. Excellent! > Is that we can all agree with? +1 -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes http://www.google.com/profiles/mhnoyes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
