Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> Any thoughts or ideas? I'm thinking that trimming the fat off of this
>> stuff, combined with UPX, might be enough for us to go glibc 2.1.x or even
>> 2.2.x for base router images. At least then, it would be easier to
>> transition from the basics to the fun stuff.
>
>
> I think glibc 2.1.x or 2.2.x on a floppy with a 2.4 kernel should be the
> target, until we find some practical reason why this just can't be done...
That would at least be a LOT easier for development than the current
situation.
>
> (although I'd be happy with a
> 1.68 meg image).
The same goes for me
Ewald Wasscher
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
