[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have visions of a cloud saying *and a miracle occurs* and then we
>proceed to make the lrp package.
>
Hehe. me too :-)
>
>
>># cd lrp
>># make
>># ls -1 pkg.lrp
>>pkg.lrp
>>
Until now I do things slightly different:
# cd mypackage
# chmod u+x lrp/rules
# lrp/rules
# ls lrp/package
lrp/mypackage.lrp
If I understand David correctly the main difference between his and my
approach is that with my approach configuration of- and compiling the
source is done by the lrp/rules makefile, instead of by the diff or by
hand.
>>
>>It's that way now, but I've just a few things to tidy up. The last
>>file I used this on was SING, and it worked well. I'm putting
>>documentation into the Makefile, and more.
>>
I still have to do so. Automatic creation of a mypackage.version file
comes to mind.
>> Once I get this fixed up,
>>I'll start cleaning the CDROM out, throwing out precompiled source in
>>favor of the source files and a LRP diff.
>>
>
>Would you mind sharing before you go into production?
>
You didn't ask _me_ but I attached some diffs anyway. Initscripts and
package.list files were shamelessly stolen from oxygen. The lrp/rules
file in the sed diff doesn't create a package as sed will be in the
root.lrp.
Ewald Wasscher
util-linux-2.11b-1lrp.diff.gz
sed-3.02-1lrp.diff.gz
