Yeah, this is what I have been finding out. I had this idea of creating a 2 floppy setup for an instant development environment. Little did I realize... Thanks for the follow up though.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] make.lrp On 19 Mar 02, at 16:02, Jacques Nilo wrote: > > I came across David's make.lrp. Assuming that dependencies are in order > > shouldn't I be able to just load this package into Bering and be able to use > > it as a development station. Any insight on this would be appreciated. > If make.lrp was compiled against glibc 2.0 which is most probably the case > there should not be any problem. Just give it a try :-) It should have been done against glibc 2.0, so there shouldn't be any problem. Of course, make isn't enough - but with gcc and automake and autoconf and all of the /usr/include headers and kernel headers and other include files and bison and flex and yacc, you should be okay :-) My thoughts on creating make was that it's useful for so many OTHER things as well: make diskimage make backupimage (who knows?) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
