On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I agree, the initramfs approach would make a technical cleaner
> implementation. But it also means (because of redundancy and a bigger
> kernel (2.6)) a bigger base image. I also don't see a lot of real
> advantages for our case yet.
Eric,
There may not be at this time. However, I believe someone in the leaf
community should evaluate it now, and work on prof-of-concept/Alpha.
This would allow the rest of us to try it out, and see if it does have
long term benefits that aren't obvious right now.
Note: I'm not advocating Bering uClibc switch to initramfs.
--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
