Hi KP Am 20.12.2015 um 15:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > ... > > Your point adding lwp's to pacjages is not valid in this case - ipsec.lwp > would have been buried in ipsec.lrp; strongswan.lrp is a complete new package.
Well, ipsec.lrp was _not_ called openswan.lrp :-) > > Probably you'll have some time, to check if ipsec.lwp can be adopted to be > used with strongswan as well? Right now I don't have sufficient infrastructure for a test. Will see hopefully soon. cheers ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
