Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <ec8cc227-dc49-458a-9725-3ce5ddc8f...@noao.edu>, Rob
Seaman writes:
You may disagree with his premises, but the request was for
candidates
for completely standalone systems requiring high precision clocks.
No, the request was for systems that could not have software updates
applied willy-nilly every six months.
Here is the original message:
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/leapsecs/2008-December/000681.html
Clearly our interpretation of the question asked differs. In any
event, that thread has moved on.
Rob
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
