M. Warner Losh wrote:
Michael Sokolov writes
: M. Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
:
: > I know that nobody is proposing rubber seconds today.
:
: Wrong! I am!
I don't think that's a viable thing to do. It would play havoc with
anything except the most low-precision timing applications. And if
you don't solve the problem for high-precision timing applications,
I'm not sure that it is a viable solution.
I figured I'd grab a chance to agree wholeheartedly with Warner :-)
Just one comment. The requirements for "timing applications" (of
whatever precision) are distinct from the requirements for civil clock
applications.
Rob
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
