Dear Leap, On Monday, 20 March 2023 00:24:56 CET, you wrote:
> <https://insidegnss.com/will-we-have-a-negative-leap-second/> > [Screen-Shot-2023-03-19-at-4.44.52-PM.jpg] > Will We Have a Negative Leap > Second?<https://insidegnss.com/will-we-have-a-negative-leap-second/> > insidegnss.com<https://insidegnss.com/will-we-have-a-negative-leap-second/> Thanks for the interesting read! In your Conclusion, you say "the CGPM resolution also stipulates that no change to current practices can occur before 2035." This is not how I read read the CGPM document on the BIPM website: "The General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM), at its 27th meeting [...] decides that the maximum value for the difference (UT1-UTC) will be increased in, or before, 2035," So in case the negative leap seconds become a real threat, according to my interpretation is is an option to increase the tolerance value earlier than 2035 to avoid trying out negative leap seconds a last and first time. Can someone confirm my view? Best regards, Jürgen Appel _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
