Could be 17 and not 7. But please let's keep the discussion to how would you enter this discrepancy in Legacy.
Thanks! Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Sally M <macia...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting to see what possibilities list members come up with. I would > suspect error on part of census taker--misunderstood the age, miswrote > it--or the entry was misread in the transcription to digital version. > On Sep 25, 2011 11:27 PM, "Tony Rolfe" <geneal...@gillandtony.com> wrote: > > A two-part question, if I may. > > > > I have discovered a ancestors in the 1861 UK Census. A working-class > > family in Newcastle. Head, wife, daughter-in-law and grandson. All > > fairly normal, except that the daughter-in-law is 7 years old, unmarried > > and has a completely different surname from the other three. > > > > Question 1. How can this be? > > Question 2. How do I record it in Legacy? > > > > Any help would be appreciated > > > > Tyhanks > > > > Tony > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
