But there are no source icons for the children unless you go into their page, are there? I do like the idea of adding the UNSOURCED master source so at least when I'm ready to work on those, I can pull them up. Thanks!
>________________________________ > From: Leon Chapman <chap...@gmail.com> >To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com >Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:43 PM >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What to do with the "I think" and "maybe" individuals? > >Peggy: > >The source icon is Grey if there are no souces for an individual in >the family view. > >You could add a new Master source called UNSOURCED and attach that to >each person you have unsourced and then you can see a list of people >who have that source named UNSOURCED. > >___ >Leon Chapman >chap...@gmail.com >----- > > > >On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Marg Strong <tiny...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> When I read this (posted as a comment in another topic) I wondered again if >> there was a way to put individuals into your tree and identify them as >> unsourced. I have a number of branches (not as important as my main line, >> but still of interest) with names, dates, children, spouses, etc that are >> found on family trees on ancestry.com without sources. The information is so >> specific it seems they have family knowledge so I hate to leave those >> individuals out of my tree. But I would like some way to identify them as >> unsourced. I suppose there is a "report" that wil show me a list of unsouced >> individuals; I haven't come to the point yet of using reports since I'm >> still working on cleaning up my database. >> >> I've sent messages to several of the owners of the trees, but rarely receive >> an answer. >> >> I know there are colors to use in Legacy, but those are used for family >> lines, is that not correct? I'm thinking of adding something in parenthesis >> after the given name of these individuals - Maybe in the prefix option - >> such as NS for "not sourced." Would that be a mistake? Is there a better way >> to tell at a glance when a family is pulled up, without having to go into >> each individuals window? I have enough cleanup to do on main family lines >> before I start on the branches that are further out. But I hate to leave out >> information that I hopefully will be able to check more throughougly later. >> >> Would appreciate your thoughts. Peggy >> >> >> Legacy User Group guidelines: >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > >Legacy User Group guidelines: >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ >Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
