On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:58:19AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> their aerial imagery from. - Ed Parsons once said that Google had to pay 
> extra for "traceable" aerial imagery as the "normal" licenses would not 
> have been suitable for using the material in an application like 
> MapMaker. If none of us makes too much noise then we'll all get away 

Is using google imagery for OSM ok for the areas where they allow
mapmaker? Has anyone asked Ed that?

cu bart

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to