On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:07:38PM +0000, Rob Myers wrote: > > By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts for > > review, > > I don't understand what an open development process for a legal document > would look like if not iterated drafting and comment.
> There should be another round of comment on the licence, no matter how > fed up everyone is with the process, but not any kind of exercise in > legal crowdsourcing or radical democracy. I don’t envisage a free‐for‐all as a necessity for open development. I’m more after seeing the licence as it is being developed, and being given the chance to comment on it throughout. This doesn’t mean I get to change it as I see fit. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
