On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Andy Allan wrote: > After lots of discussions and "What if..." scenarios we've all come to > the realisation that it's much better to find out what actually > happens, and make decisions based on the results.
I still don't agree with this approach. It doesn't sit with my idea of democracy. When people vote they need to know for what they are voting, and what the cut off marks are considered to be. Even a broad statement which said (100 - Y)% = pass (100 - Y - X)% = uncertain (100 - Y - X - Z)% = fail where X, Y, Z are positive numbers would be an improvement on a situation which says "When we get the numbers we'll decide on the cutoff point" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
