On 20 August 2010 21:30, Nick Hocking <nick.hock...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is for this reason that I believe clause 3 of the CT is essential. This > current situation must not be allowed to happen again.
The problem is the scope of section 3, not it's existence. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
