On 25 August 2010 17:41, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > I am against trying to force our will on "OSM in 10 years". OSM in ten years > will have a larger community and a larger data volume by orders of > magnitude. I don't think it is right to force their hand in any way over and > above the necessary minimum just because a few of us think so.
You keep making the same logic fallacy about making OSM more free, you also keep assuming the user base will keep growing, but you are also at the same time not asking the community what they want you are assuming you know what's best. It's this kind of flagrant arrogance that can lead to a projects demise, what's the point in considering things 10 years from now if there is no contributors in 10 years from now because you stifled their options from sourcing data too much? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
