On 25/08/2010 13:29, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Gregory Arenius<greg...@arenius.com> wrote:
http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2.asp
>
That license looks pretty bad to me, from an "including the data in
OSM" point of view.
Nonetheless, it's not one of the worse licenses I've seen. I guess that
SFgov would be willing to share some data if asked nicely.
Speaking of which, how many people from the OSM-US "chapter" are there
in SF? A meeting between OSM-US and SFgov could prove useful IMHO.
Best,
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega <i...@sanchezortega.es>
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
