I think it's relevant that node changes as suggested should involve stand alone nodes only (such as POI).
Once they are part of a structure of say a building or a road, water or any area, the nodes should be considered a "composition" rather then 4 nodes. While the underlying structure is a geographic fact, the choice of place nodes and the number to represent the structure is a creative work. I think this seems an obvious conclusion, but should be made clear. In addition the LWG should also pay some attention to relations. Regards, Gert -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com] Verzonden: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:44 AM Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions. Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote: > On 12/20/2011 10:11 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote: >>> Of particular interest are: >>> - can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position? > > While you are at it, I would love to hear about a specific subset of the > cases encompassed by this question : the cases where the edit is > correlated with a change of source. I asked this question a week ago in > the "Are objects still tainted when they are edited from a better source > ?" thread here and it has not been answered yet. And we're listening. Tell us and be specific. Some of us have been remapping for a while. Give examples. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
