Paul I was basing my thoughts on this statement
> There a total of 31k objects, of which 28k are version 1. "Version 1" would seem to imply not moved, or am I mixing something up? Simon / / Am 29.04.2013 11:40, schrieb Paul Norman: > > Clarification on numbers: > > > > Assuming every node has been moved, we'd be talking about 26k place or > mountain peak nodes I can definitely keep, about 3k I can restore from > the existing redactions, and about 3k that I'm not sure about. > > > > Now, it's entirely possible a bunch of nodes haven't been moved from > the HGK positions, in which case they'd be completely removed. I won't > know that until I go ahead with the SQL to identify the nodes. > > > > *From:*Henning Scholland [mailto:o...@aighes.de] > *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 2:31 AM > *To:* Licensing and other legal discussions. > *Subject:* Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey > > > > Am 29.04.2013 11:27, schrieb Simon Poole: > > > > I would agree that there is some value in having "naked" place > nodes. However considering that at best we are talking about 2-3k > such nodes surviving it is a question if doing an imagery based > "add a place" drive or similar for Turkey after the redaction > wouldn't be more efficient. > > Simon > > Yes, maybe this would be a better solution. > > Henning > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
