Hi, On 10.09.2013 11:20, Martin Feuersaenger wrote: > To be hones, the license reading was quite confusing and frustrating. I > couldn't really pull out crystal clear information from these texts. > So my question is: Is my conclusion right, can I publish under less > restrictive terms, or do I need to remove the shots in order to publish > at all?
*Personally*, i.e. if I had to decide, I'd just upload under any license I want and assume that my use of Google/Bing/whatever was "fair use". The concept of "fair use" is different in different jurisdictions and content providers have a history of trying to abolish fair use altogether (oops, I've quoted a sentence of yours above, do I have to pay royalties now...). Still, my own working assumption is that if in a talk about maps I include an example of Google maps then it's fair use and I'm not bound by their respective license terms. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
