It's not just the disputed border; the bill as proposed would make it illegal to possess "geospatial data", i.e., copies of OSM, without a license:
http://geoawesomeness.com/problems-with-the-geospatial-information-regulation-bill/ Luis On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:35 PM Mr. Stace D Maples <stacemap...@stanford.edu> wrote: > Anyone else noticed this? Pretty hefty fine, and the article specifically > references the OSM depiction of disputed boundaries as problematic. > > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/06/cartographers-beware-india-warns-of-15-million-fine-for-maps-it-doesnt-like/ > > In F,L&T, > Stace Maples > Geospatial Manager > Stanford Geospatial Center > @mapninja > G+, Skype, Hangout: stacey.maples > 214.641.0920 > Find GeoData: https://earthworks.stanford.edu > Get GeoHelp: https://gis.stanford.edu/ > stanfordgis Listserv: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stanfordgis > > "I have a map of the United States... actual size. > It says, "Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile." > I spent last summer folding it." > -Steven Wright- > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk