the guideline is about individual results, not about aggregations, for > which the share alike provisions persist. From my interpretation this also > implies that the attribution requirements persist for individual results, > because otherwise it would not be clear that you cannot aggregate them. Do > you agree? >
No, the guideline was explicitly about both individual results and aggregations. Individual results are insubstantial, so no ODbL obligations attach at all (attribution is one of the ODbL obligations). A collection of results is not a Derivative Database *unless* the collection is used as a general geodatabase (basically, if you tried to reverse engineer OSM by mass geocoding). That means that in normal circumstances, for a collection of results (an aggregation), the sharealike provisions *do not* persist.
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
