Nathan Coulson wrote: > On 8/10/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/10/07, Nathan Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Do hope to come back to it someday though, Who is in charge of the >>> bootscripts these days? >>> >> I think DJ officially, but I've been doing most of the maintenance for >> a while. I'd love to see you involved again Nathan, there's quite a >> few things I'd like to address about the bootscripts. Most people >> don't seem that interested in peering into the ugly corners of >> init.d/functions, though :) >> >> I think for LFS-7.0, we should consider the LSB style scripts that DJ >> has in contrib/lsb-v3. There's a couple patches floating around on >> lfs-dev, too, even if we don't go full bore LSB style. Not much has >> changed, but I think all the *proc functions could have a thorough >> cleaning. Some things in there are either suboptimal or just wrong >> (mostly with handling of pid files). >> >> -- >> Dan >> -- >> > > thanks dan, coming back from holidays in a coupple of weeks, maybe > (if DJ doesn't mind, and work doesn't keep me away again), I'll see if > I can get back in action. > > I haven't touched the bootscripts since I thought you were back last time. Didn't know I was 'responsible' for them still. I have had barely more time than you. Hell LSB-V3 sat on my dev box for months before I finally got them cleaned up. I still need to get the last change to checkfs in there before the 6.3 tarball is rolled too.
-- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
