On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:15:25PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> And because the LFS staff working on this is only you, and
> I've read many things (Greg's comments) that disagree with
> your analysis, I'd sure like more discussion before any of
> this is committed.

Most of what is currently in the jh branch agrees with what Greg has
suggested. If you had really been paying close attention to the
development, you would have seen the evolution that the branch has taken
largely due to these very discussions.

In fact the only thing that I can think of that is currently
not in harmony with his many comments is the -m64 bits, which will
now be removed thanks to the further disussion that occurred in this
thread.
 
> Please Jeremy, get community approval before anything is
> committed.

You sound unnecessarily worried. Have you not seen my repeated requests
for comments and noticed that I had been deliberately keeping all of
these items in a separate branch, waiting for community approval?\

The whole point for the branch was that I would be able to work with
some new concepts in a _publicly_viewable_ and therefore
_easily_discussed_ arena without altering trunk.

--
JH
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to