Greg Schafer wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> I've done a test. Hopefully I made the correct assumptions here: >> >> * Build as per usual up to gcc-pass2 >> >> * Build gcc-pass2 according to instructions *execpt* do not add >> -fomit-frame-pointer to XCFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in > > ??? > > Um, you have it arse about dude. You need to *add* -fomit-frame-pointer to > avoid differences. That's the whole point of the exercise. This was all > explained in graphic detail here:
*sigh* Are you sure you're not reading my post backwards? -fomit-frame-pointer *is* added by default to gcc-pass2, when we're *not* bootstrapping, so, the default instructions on pass2 include -fomit-frame-pointer and --disable-bootstrap. To test the above against a bootstrapped build, I removed the -fomit-frame-pointer, (because in a bootstrap build it is there by default, yes?) and I removed the --disable-bootstrap flag. The above should produce identical compilers right? -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
