On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:43:55PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I used 'native' in my proposal earlier. 'generic' may be a bit more > conservative, but I think 'native' would be better for most people. If > you change it, how about adding another sentence that 'native' is an > option but issues may arise if you copy the libraries to another system > with a different processor.
Well, the reason for 'generic', assuming I'm understanding Dan correctly, is that glibc would be tuned for 'native' but everything else that gcc builds on your system is by default 'generic'. Better to have it all the same. But, yes, I like showing people their options. So if it changes, I wouldn't mind at all mentioning 'native' as an option. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
