baho utot wrote: > > On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote: >> On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote: >> >>> the configure should be: >>> >>> ./configure --disable-nologin >>> >>> as nologin was previously installed by shadow >> >> Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is >> desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary. > > I am using rpm package manager. It causes a conflict when a file is > already installed by another package. > You then have to remove one of them from one of the packages. > >> >> Coreutils will also overwrite groups program because it is better than >> shadow's groups binary. > > There isn't a "groups" executeable installed by shadow.
Yes, we do disable that. >> Rather, shadow, if not wanting to install groups or nologin installed, >> could edit Makefile.in to exclude those. > > On my builds I just rm the duplicate file from one of the packages > before it is packaged up by rpm so I don't have to edit any of the > Makefiles. > > For the book the later package will over write the earlier package, and > you will not know the over write has occurred. That seems like the correct behavior to me. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
