On Mon, February 12, 2007 20:51, Curran Schiefelbein wrote: > Funny that the remaining copy had a non-null pointer in it, though I > initialized the pointer to NULL in the transactor constructor. (That's > why I thought it was actively overwritten.)
Perhaps you were invoking a different constructor than you thought? Jeroen _______________________________________________ Libpqxx-general mailing list Libpqxx-general@gborg.postgresql.org http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/libpqxx-general
