On Wed, April 11, 2007 15:46, Gary Popov wrote: Hi Gary,
I'm not too familiar with this compiler but I don't see anything in the source code that could explain it. I don't suppose it's something simple like the makefile for libpqxx linking in util.obj twice? More follows: > ------ Build started: Project: test, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ > Linking... > libpqxx_staticD.lib(util.obj) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall > pqxx::internal::refcount::~refcount(void)" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@pqxx@@ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) already defined in libpqxx.lib(libpqxx.dll) > libpqxx_staticD.lib(util.obj) : error LNK2005: "public: bool __thiscall > pqxx::internal::refcount::loseref(void)" > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@QAE_NXZ) > already defined in libpqxx.lib(libpqxx.dll) This strikes me as odd--as if you're linking to both a static and a dynamic library. Then again, on some systems I believe the usual way of dealing with dynamic libraries is to link with a static library of "stubs" jumping to the dynamic library's functions. So maybe it's just that. > so... I'm wondering if I did something wrong? I recall fidling with the > header files a bit (uh-oh), but I don't remember 100% what I did. I think > I > changed all of the instances of disable_noticer from > pqxx::internal::disable_noticer to just pqxx::disable_noticer, but I don't > see how this would have any impact... or would it? No, that shouldn't affect anything. Could it be an issue of Debug vs. Release builds? Jeroen _______________________________________________ Libpqxx-general mailing list Libpqxx-general@gborg.postgresql.org http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/libpqxx-general
