https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159375
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|24.2.0.1 rc |24.2.0.0 alpha0+
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
CC| |stephane.guillou@libreoffic
| |e.org
--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
<stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> ---
I notice the difference between first and second time it is open. Significant
enough to notice the delay compared to other dialogs.
Indeed, it started with a4633dadb4233ad5587bd238449671d610540c81, the fix for
bug 49895 (build [418e06688c9c388d95dd968db114337a6aad9aa5] in linux-64-24.2
bibisect repo).
(In reply to Bayram Çiçek from comment #3)
> Anyway, my suggestion is that: don't initialize the dialogs at the opening
> of "Options" but initialize all dialogs at the time of searching. In that
> way, there will be no latency of opening "Tools > Options" but disadvantage
> will be that searching will take a bit more time.
I assume the delay would be only for the first search, and if the indexing
happens as soon as the field is clicked, it might be barely noticeable as it
takes some time for the user to type their query.
I'd go with that! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
