https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89130

Yousuf Philips (jay) <philip...@hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gulsah.1...@gmail.com,
                   |                            |momonas...@gmail.com

--- Comment #18 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <philip...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Ulrich Gemkow from comment #17)
> I could try to implement this, when this is the preferred way and
> accepted/wanted from the UI experts.

+1 from this UI expert. Heiko, Stuart: thoughts?

> But - who can draw/design the other two
> icons (for "not visible" and "not printable") besides the lock symbol which
> is used in calc? What is the "process" to "request" icons?

If i am reading Gulsah's and Eike's patches correctly, the lock symbol is being
rendered from a font and not an icon.

> And the next question: In comment 9 a context menu in proposed for changing
> the layer attributes. Should the context menu be additional to the shortcuts
> or replace them?

Additional to the click shortcuts.

> If this is in addition there would be three ways to achieve
> the same (dialog box, contex menu, shortcuts). Is this really wanted? Who
> can decide this?

Yes this would be wanted, as only advanced users would know/remember the
shortcuts. You can take my decision on this. The entries would need to be new
UNO commands, so that they can appear in the context menu xml file.

https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sd/uiconfig/sdraw/popupmenu/layertab.xml

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to