I'll bring this up at our next conference call and see if there is a possible solution.
Best Regards, Joel On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, John Smith <lbalba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Sounds good, but I agree with John that better instructions are needed. > I'm > > working on a new triage page and hopefully in there we can get someone to > > contribute incredibly precise, easy for noobs, instructions for every > type > > of backtrace/debug. Right now they are really written by experts for > experts > > (IMO). I would backtrace much more frequently if I could follow the > > instructions on how to do it. Every time I feel like I have to go on IRC > and > > ask 100 questions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think we have enough people packaging to make pre-built binaries > for > > everyone. Plus, these are huge, my install is 22 gigs with all symbols > on, > > not very good for packaging purposes. > > > I guess it all depends on who your target audience is. If you really > want end-users (libre office users) to provide backtraces, you really > need to make the threshold for doing that as low as possible. I dont > think it is reasonable to have end-users compile source code for > themselves; especially on windows, where it requires msvc or cygwin to > do so. >
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
