Hi Thomas, I see, it is better to have people reviewing the cases. Before that, I think the way we are working on is also good to optimize test case:
Some one write cases -> people find it unclear or buggy -> update test case to be more understandable BTW, I didn't comment on more details in caseversion#305 because I saw the problematic wording in the steps description as well. Do you mind if I try to update the case next week, though I am not a native speaker either :) Best wishes, Yifan >>> Thomas Hackert <thack...@nexgo.de> 04/14/13 3:04 PM >>> > Would you please help to update the English version as well? Thanks! Well, I have done it in the past, when I was sure, that something was wrong ... ;) But ... As I am not a native speaker of the English language (and my last English lesson was years ago, so I forgot too many things ... :( ), I would prefer someone more knowledgeable than me to have a look at the test cases (but the Wiki pages about QA/testing as well ... ;) ) ... ;) Have a nice day Thomas. <TOFU removed> -- NP: Math The Band – Ode to Carjackers _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/