Hi Jonas,
Jonas Finnemann Jensen schrieb:
This is a problem in the SmNodeToTextVisitor...
Have you tried latest version... Luke have been (and may still be)
working on this issue.
I have installed RC2 now, but I see no difference in formula editor.
The problem is that the use of brackets in expressions is context dependent.
Notice the difference between binom { A } { B } C and { binom { A } {
B } } C, where A, B and C are expressions...
I see no difference. And why should there be a difference? The command
"binom" takes two operands, so the expression is finished after binom {
A } { B } and I see no need for brackets around it.
(1) Short ^ and _ are exchanged with long rsup and rsub.
(2) A lot of additional braces and spaces are added.
(3) The part "from ... to " is exchanged with csup and csub.
Definitely points to improve... The main concern at the moment is to
have a node to text visitor that preserves the resulting formula...
Luke have already removed a lot of brackets that wasn't necessary...
Do you want bug reports for these problems?
Leaving out whitespace is not a problem but how much whitespace do you
think is good... ?
I personally use blanks only where it is necessary to separate things.
In addition I use carriage returns to structure expressions, especially
matrices.
For example I write
f%prime(x)=func e^-{x^2 over 2}
and
6 a + 5,5b
latter because of the bug, that in 6a the a is not italic.
Kind regards
Regina
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
