Hi Bjoern, OK, thanks for the info. Not a real problem. I have a headache mostly because of the sd module, but now sd tests are moved to slowcheck, so something improved here at least. I guess if this fast tests (run by "make") are not usefull in general, in long term they will be moved all to slowcheck anyway.
Best Regards, Tamás 2017-11-12 21:03 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Michaelsen < bjoern.michael...@libreoffice.org>: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:00:33PM +0100, Zolnai Tamás wrote: > > Independently from the actual question, which is still unanswered, > > If the question is "why do we have this status quo?" the answer is > "because it > is result of some dozen discussions between developers (mostly on the > ESC).". > ~Every argument has already been made and I assume most are also preserved > for > eternity in the ESC minutes. > > > it's always a pleasure to see how "old" developers - living in a > symbiosis > > with the code - are worrying about the status quo. > > If you assume the status quo to be my personal best preference, I can > assure you > that is not the case. If you would dig through the six years of debate on > ESC, > you will even find that I was supporting tests to only be run on "make > check" > (to be consistent with autotools). That was not going to be due to this > thing > called "compromise". > > Im just warning that this is a bikeshedding topic that we already had an > expensive compromise on -- and reopening this will at best require updating > lots of docs and will at worst open yet another longwinded discussion -- > for little gain. > > Best, > > Bjoern >
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice