Hi Olivier, On 2012-01-04 at 15:55 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > WRT to this patch, there are two files; the binary file opens____.ttf > > and the text file OpenSymbol.sfd. > > Right - the original / authoritative version should be the .sdf file > which (IIRC) as well as being 'diff -u' able - so we can see what > changed, is/was also more descriptive & complete :-) > > > I used fontforge tool under ubuntu to draw the new characters. > > Great - that's the right approach. > > > The sfd file is generated based on the ttf binaries. > > So - IMHO it should be the other way around ;-) at least, when I last > edited that font; if we've fluffed that up I suggest we load the > original sfd, copy in the new glyphs from the TTF, save it as sfd, and > re-export as ttf ;-) I am sorry, but I have just reverted the push of your change based on what Michael wrote (and I previously too). Please note that .sfd is the source, and .ttf is generated. When you use .sfd as the source in fontforge, the change will be minimal, not a 85k lines long patch. Can you please re-try with editing the .sfd in fontforge? [If you use .ttf as the source, and generate .sfd out of that, it is similar as if you import .pdf in LO, and export it to .odf - ie. it is possible, but not what we want, provided that we have the .sfd source.] Regards, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice