Michael Meeks wrote:
>       So - I don't think that should be an issue, but Thorsten would know. In
> a nutshell though the approach is right - it is a madness to ship 2x
> versions of libraries when we could ship one - and having tons of stuff
> as .oxts when we ship it be default is just silly :-)
> 
+1

Let's turn all our in-tree c++ extensions into proper, optional
components.  Shipping those by default was the first step towards
this, desirable, end goal.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: pgpET36YDWuC3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to