On Thursday 03 of May 2012, Julien Nabet wrote: > On 30/04/2012 15:01, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 01:15 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > > FWIW I *think* we're still building the "universal" LibO on a > > RHEL-4-alike baseline so we'd need some route to use the api that > > exists on glib2-2.4.7 (!, ?) so we can't unconditionally use > > g_source_get_time Either need some ifdefs or seeing as docs now claim > > that g_source_get_current_time ignores source and is the same as > > g_get_current_time and a quick peek at the code confirms this just use > > that instead, i.e. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bb36072c92687a954 > >a38aeca7fb9945f8e7cca13 I'd personally skip it for cherry-picking to 3-5 > > C. > > I finally succeeded in compiling 3.5 branch by using some pragmas. I > just learn how to use them so perhaps it's not the best efficient way to > use them. > I just wonder if the patch attached could be useful to push on 3.5 branch. > > Any idea ?
Is there any point in building stable releases with -Werror? If a warning points to an actual error, it'll get caught in master as well and backported, if it's serious. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice