On 12/02/2012 04:06 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:47:01AM +0000, tino wrote:
We should not implement them in rtl/math.hxx until there are more users
than calc's interpreter that need it. Lets not overcomplicate this stuff
as long as it is not necessary.
What about implementation in random.cxx and creating random.hxx so all
the random stuff is in one place?
Why do you want this abstraction? Following KISS I would just start
implementing the functions in ScInterpreter and extract commonly used
parts into an own method. If at some point other parts of Libreoffice
also need random functions with known statistical properties we can
still extract them.
Yes; please keep the sal interface as small and simple as possible.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
