On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:45:37PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1599 > > Do people generally consider it a good idea to include binary > documentation files (rather than some helpful ASCII art in the > existing */README files, say) in the core repo? I personally > consider it not very practical.
Let me quote my comment from gerrit I posted before approving this change: > Nice, thanks! :-) > > Two ideas for a possibly follow-up patch: > > 1) Wouldn't it make more sense to store this as fodg, so git diff is > more meaningful when later this is extended? > > 2) sfx2/README should mention this file, I think, so it's easier to find > it. An ASCII-art is even easier to read, but I think an (f)odg is far better, than nothing as well. Miklos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
