On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > > 2013/4/21 Chris Sherlock <chris.sherloc...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', 'chris.sherloc...@gmail.com');>> > >> On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >>> >>> >>> No and as long as you don't plan to work on them I doubt anyone is going >>> to do it soon. >> >> >> There's a friendly response... Where did you get that idea? >> > > Please understand that posting at the developer mailing list will often > result in a response asking you to show some work in this area. This is > part of the rule of the mailing list and if you feel uncomfortable with > this you should move the discussion to the discuss list which is exactly > for that case. > > Understood, I only raised it because I'm interested in statistics and was wondering if it might be worthwhile putting some effort into it. I should have made that more clear.
> > >> >>> Additionally as long as this mainly serves as theoretical discussion >> >> >> Why do you consider this to be a theoretical discussion? Don't you feel >> there is any merit in the data sets? >> > > I never said there is no merit in these data sets but as long as nobody is > doing the work this is a purely theoretical discussion. > > >> >> >>> I think it is off-topic here and should be moved to the discuss list. >> >> >> Why is that? It's a fairly innocent enquiry. >> > > Because this is the developer mailing list where we discuss code and code > related questions. General discussions that are not backed up by code > should be moved to the discuss mailing list or the user mailing list. > Please also see the general rules for the developer mailing list at > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Use_of_MailList > Apologies, didn't mean to break mailing list etiquette. I'm sorry if that sounds rude but I think that discussing this without > planning on working on it is just wasted time. If you want to work on this > issues we are happy to provide you with some code pointers. As I already > mentioned in my other mail IMHO the right solution is to provide an > interface to R. > Fair enough. Regards, > Markus > Chris
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice