Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On systems without argz we were exporting unmangled symbols argz_count > and argz_add from libltdl. Not really a good idea. Rather than mangle > the names, since we do not use either function, they were removed.
But wasn't there a thread back in June where we explicitly added a bunch of argz functions, so that (a) we would be using the same file as gnulib, and (b) that file would have a complete argz implementation? Doesn't your patch fork our copy again? (Or have I missed some intervening decisions/development)? -- Chuck
