On 1/7/2011 1:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> Err...that's not really uncommon. > [...] > > OK, but I still would accept those kinds of changes to code for > little-used system only when someone has actually *tested* them in that > particular situation, and found the code to be erroneous prior patch and > working afterwards. We've been pestering other users to try out our > patches for a good reason, I don't see why this should be treated less > strict.
OK, I'll add it to my list to create a mingw->linux compiler at home, and use it to build (e.g.) libtool-enabled libpng from a cygwin shell. (mingw->linux as a stand-in for mingw->$embedded since I can only do this sort of thing at home, rather than at work where I have access to mingw->$embedded). Or maybe I'll look into an Android dev env (which is mingw->android) instead, and try to use it from cygwin. But...it probably won't happen soon. -- Chuck